Right After The IG Report Was Released, Durham Issues A Rebuttal To Horowitz’s Findings: “We Do Not Agree With Some Of The Report’s Conclusions As To Predication & How FBI Case Was Opened”

[Image Source: Justice OIG & Fox News Video Screenshots. Us4Trump.com Compilation].

U.S. Attorney John Durham, who is conducting a wide-ranging investigation of the origins of the Trump-Russia probe, released a rare statement Monday after DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz issued his FISA report.

In his statement, Durham said that he “disagrees with the conclusions of the FISA report.”

U.S. Attorney John Durham’s statement reads as follows:

“I have the utmost respect for the mission of the Office of Inspector General and the comprehensive work that went into the report prepared by Mr. Horowitz and his staff.

“However, our investigation is not limited to developing information from within component parts of the Justice Department.”

Our investigation has included developing information from other persons and entities, both in the U.S. and outside of the U.S. Based on the evidence collected to date, and while our investigation is ongoing, last month we advised the Inspector General that we do not agree with some of the report’s conclusions as to predication and how the FBI case was opened.”

As Horowitz has conducted his review of DOJ actions during the Russia probe, Durham, the U.S. attorney for Connecticut, has also been conducting a wider inquiry into alleged misconduct and alleged improper government surveillance on the Trump campaign during the 2016 presidential election. (Continued Below)

Horowitz released his report Monday saying his investigators found no intentional misconduct or political bias surrounding efforts to launch that 2016 probe and to seek a highly controversial Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant to monitor former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page in the early months of the investigation. Still, it found that there were “significant concerns with how certain aspects of the investigation were conducted and supervised,” as reported by Fox News. 

In October, Durham’s probe transitioned into a full-fledged criminal investigation.

Meanwhile, Attorney General William Barr issued a scathing statement of the FBI’s “intrusive” investigation after the release of Horowitz’s review, saying it was launched based on the “thinnest of suspicions.” (Continued Below)

“The Inspector General’s report now makes clear that the FBI launched an intrusive investigation of a U.S. presidential campaign on the thinnest of suspicions that, in my view, were insufficient to justify the steps taken,” Barr said in a statement.

“It is also clear that, from its inception, the evidence produced by the investigation was consistently exculpatory,” Barr said. “Nevertheless, the investigation and surveillance was pushed forward for the duration of the campaign and deep into President Trump’s administration.”

Barr also said the FISA report shows a “clear abuse” of the surveillance process.

“In the rush to obtain and maintain FISA surveillance of Trump campaign associates, FBI officials misled the FISA court, omitted critical exculpatory facts from their filings, and suppressed or ignored information negating the reliability of their principal source,” Barr stated.

He added, “The Inspector General found the explanations given for these actions unsatisfactory. While most of the misconduct identified by the Inspector General was committed in 2016 and 2017 by a small group of now-former FBI officials, the malfeasance and misfeasance detailed in the Inspector General’s report reflects a clear abuse of the FISA process.”

Leave a Reply